4. How do branches work?#
4.1. Review#
Note
This part of the notes is the key facts of the questions we did, not the questions, you can reivew the actual questions on Prismia
cd
with no path changes to home (~
)absolute paths start with
/
orC:\
or similar on Windows outside of bashabsolute paths always work, like an address; relative paths are starting point specific, like directions
.
is a special file that references the current location, for example, we can stage all of the files in the working directory withgit add .
4.2. Back to the gh-inclass repo#
Recall, We can move around and examine the computer’s file structure using shell commands.
First we will navigate to our working directory for class that we made in the last class
To confirm our current working directory we print it with pwd
pwd
/Users/brownsarahm
Now that we know where we are, we can move to the target location
cd Documents/inclass/systems/
and look at the location again to confirm it is what we expected
pwd
/Users/brownsarahm/Documents/inclass/systems
Tip
In class, I demod the fact about cd
without a path going to home and then used my built in history to repeat a command by using the ↑ key
Then we move into the gh inclass repo
cd gh-inclass-sp24-brownsarahm/
and confirm the path
pwd
/Users/brownsarahm/Documents/inclass/systems/gh-inclass-sp24-brownsarahm
4.3. Branches do not sync automatically#
First, we will look at where we left off to refresh, then we will make a change in GitHub and see how that impacts our local copy.
We start examining our local copy by looking at the working directory
ls
README.md about.md
we see both files like we expected.
git status
On branch 2-create-an-about-file
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/2-create-an-about-file'.
nothing to commit, working tree clean
and everything is logged in git.
4.4. Getting to GitHub from your local system#
Warning
This requires that you have the gh
CLI working
It is finicky on GitBash, but if it does not work you can navigate in your browser.
If yours did not work, but then you figure out a fix to make it work, submit that as an FAQ on the git and github faq page for a community badge.
gh repo view --web
Opening github.com/compsys-progtools/gh-inclass-sp24-brownsarahm in your browser.
In the browser, we merged the PR we opened on Tuesday, that updates the main branch on GitHub with 2 more commits:
the commit that was on the
2-create-an-about-file
the merge commit
First we check,
git status
On branch 2-create-an-about-file
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/2-create-an-about-file'.
nothing to commit, working tree clean
merging on GitHub does not change anythign locally
Back on our local computer, we will go back to the main branch, using git checkout
git cehkout main
git: 'cehkout' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.
The most similar command is
checkout
Now, I spell it correctly and actually switch
git checkout main
Switched to branch 'main'
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/main'.
It says we are up to date with origin/main
and remember origin
is the name of the remote that is where we cloned from on GitHub.com.
Now, we look at the working directory.
ls
README.md
the file is missing. It said it was up to date with origin main, but that is the most recent time we checked github only. It’s up to date with our local record of what is on GitHub, not the current GitHub.
We can also confirm that it is not hidden:
ls -a
. .. .git .github README.md
4.5. Updating Locally#
Updating locally involves 2 steps:
update the local repo (the .git directory with all of the commits)
update the working directory
Next, we will update locally, with git fetch
git fetch
remote: Enumerating objects: 1, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (1/1), done.
remote: Total 1 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Unpacking objects: 100% (1/1), 919 bytes | 919.00 KiB/s, done.
From https://github.com/compsys-progtools/gh-inclass-sp24-brownsarahm
faef6af..1e2a45f main -> origin/main
Here we see 2 sets of messages. Some lines start with “remote” and other lines do not.
The “remote” lines are what git
on the GitHub server said in response to our request and the
other lines are what git
on your local computer said.
So, here, it counted up the content, and then sent it on GitHub’s side. On the local side, it unpacked (remember git compressed the content before we sent it). It describes the changes that were made on the GitHub side, the main branch was moved from one commit to another. So it then updates the local main branch accordingly (“Updating 6a12db0…caeacb5”).
Now, again, we check the working directory
ls
README.md
no changes yet. fetch
updates the .git directory so that git knows more, but does not update our local file system.
However, we can see the impact of the fetch
using git status
git status
On branch main
Your branch is behind 'origin/main' by 2 commits, and can be fast-forwarded.
(use "git pull" to update your local branch)
nothing to commit, working tree clean
Now, git knows that our local main is behind origin/main
and by how much and tells us how to apply the changes to the local branch.
So we do that.
git pull
Updating faef6af..1e2a45f
Fast-forward
about.md | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 about.md
It applies the changes to the local directory too:
ls
README.md about.md
4.6. What other tools do I have to examine things on the terminal#
Lets try two more ways of looking at our repo and files. Then we will use those to learn more about working with branches.
4.6.1. Git log#
We can see commits with git log
git log
this is a program, we can use enter/down arrow to move through it and then q
to exit.
commit 1e2a45fbca5ce7bf775827f5f4dbe23b6561cff4 (HEAD -> main, origin/main, origin/HEAD)
Merge: faef6af 81c6f18
Author: Sarah Brown <brownsarahm@uri.edu>
Date: Thu Feb 1 12:51:17 2024 -0500
Merge pull request #4 from compsys-progtools/2-create-an-about-file
create about file close s #2
commit 81c6f187f146caaaf43d97bc1bb8ed237142f4c3 (origin/2-create-an-about-file, 2-create-an-about-file)
Author: Sarah M Brown <brownsarahm@uri.edu>
Date: Tue Jan 30 13:33:54 2024 -0500
create about file close s #2
commit faef6af98e6bd0951ebcefb809ff4e353a0c7fbc
Author: Sarah Brown <brownsarahm@uri.edu>
Date: Tue Jan 30 13:03:36 2024 -0500
start readme, closes #3
commit 98cff657d25adf9a0820a04d60f6409445f70e76
Author: github-classroom[bot] <66690702+github-classroom[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue Jan 30 17:53:54 2024 +0000
Initial commit
4.6.2. Concatenate a file#
the cat
command *concatenates a files’ contents to the terminal output (which is actually a special file called standard out or stdout)
cat about.md
I like to ski
4.7. Making a branch locally#
Important
It is totally okay to test ideas out and see what happens as a way to investigate how things work. Here we tested a few suggestions to see what works. This lets us learn 2 things:
what works
how to read error messages
4.7.1. Checkout requires the branch to exist#
git checkout my_branchcehcekd
error: pathspec 'my_branchcehcekd' did not match any file(s) known to git
This error message says that it cannot switch because the name we gave does not already exist. This is a good to recognize error message because this is also what would happen if you tried to switch, but spelled the branch name wrong.
4.7.2. the -b option lets checkout create a branch#
git checkout -b my_branch_cehckoutb
Switched to a new branch 'my_branch_cehckoutb'
Success!
the -b
lets git checkout
both create and switch to a branch
4.7.3. create is not an option#
git branch create example
fatal: not a valid object name: 'example'
This error message is tricky; it only complains about example
. We could try
git branch create
this gives no response, but if we use git branch
we would see it created a branch called create
.
So, back to our original attempt, is that it thinks we are asking to make a branch named create
but then sees this extra thing example
that it doesn’t know what to do with, so blames that for the error.
4.7.4. Chaining commands together#
Finally, we tried:
git branch my_branch; git checkout my_branch
Switched to branch 'my_branch'
This worked. From this example, we learn a 2 things:
git branch <new name>
creates a new branchwe can put multiple commands on a “single line” using
;
between them
4.7.5. We can list branches#
without any argument, we get a list of the branches that exist`
git branch
2-create-an-about-file
main
* my_branch
my_branch_cehckoutb
note it also indicates which branch you are on
4.8. Branches are pointers#
We’ll go back to main
git checkout main
Switched to branch 'main'
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/main'.
and then make a new branch for the next changes we will make.
We’ve used git checkout
to switch branches before. To also create a branch at the same time, we use the -b
option.
git checkout -b fun_fact
Switched to a new branch 'fun_fact'
If we use git log
to see the commits, we can see more about the branches.
git log
commit 1e2a45fbca5ce7bf775827f5f4dbe23b6561cff4 (HEAD -> fun_fact, origin/main, origin/HEAD, my_branch_cehckoutb, my_branch, main)
Merge: faef6af 81c6f18
Author: Sarah Brown <brownsarahm@uri.edu>
Date: Thu Feb 1 12:51:17 2024 -0500
Merge pull request #4 from compsys-progtools/2-create-an-about-file
create about file close s #2
commit 81c6f187f146caaaf43d97bc1bb8ed237142f4c3 (origin/2-create-an-about-file, 2-create-an-about-file)
Author: Sarah M Brown <brownsarahm@uri.edu>
Date: Tue Jan 30 13:33:54 2024 -0500
create about file close s #2
commit faef6af98e6bd0951ebcefb809ff4e353a0c7fbc
Author: Sarah Brown <brownsarahm@uri.edu>
Date: Tue Jan 30 13:03:36 2024 -0500
start readme, closes #3
commit 98cff657d25adf9a0820a04d60f6409445f70e76
Author: github-classroom[bot] <66690702+github-classroom[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue Jan 30 17:53:54 2024 +0000
Initial commit
branches are pointers a branch points to a commit.
Note in the above that we have different branches pointed to different commits.
4.9. Linking a locally created branch to a remote#
Next we will edit the file so we can create a commit.
nano about.md
Add any fun fact on the line below your content. Then, write out (save), it will prompt the file name. Since we opened nano with a file name (about.md
) specified, you will not need to type a new name, but to confirm it, by pressing enter/return.
we used the nano text editor. nano
is simpler than other text editors that tend to be more popular among experts, vim
and emacs
. Getting comfortable with nano will get you used to the ideas, without putting as much burden on your memory. This will set you up to learn those later, if you need a more powerful terminal text editor.
cat about.md
I like to ski
I came to URI in 2020
My file now has 2 lines in it.
Now we check the status
git status
On branch fun_fact
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: about.md
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
Now the file is modified instead of what we saw before that was untracked
Again we stage it first:
git add about.md
then look again
git status
On branch fun_fact
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
modified: about.md
and commit.
git commit -m 'add a fun fact'
[fun_fact 07897fd] add a fun fact
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Then we push
git push
fatal: The current branch fun_fact has no upstream branch.
To push the current branch and set the remote as upstream, use
git push --set-upstream origin fun_fact
To have this happen automatically for branches without a tracking
upstream, see 'push.autoSetupRemote' in 'git help config'.
but it fails.
It cannot push, because it does not know where to push, like we noted above that it did not comapre to origin, that was beecause it does not have an “upstream branch” or a corresponding branch on a remote server.
We follow git’s advice
git push --set-upstream origin fun_fact
Enumerating objects: 5, done.
Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads
Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done.
Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 287 bytes | 287.00 KiB/s, done.
Total 3 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (1/1), completed with 1 local object.
remote:
remote: Create a pull request for 'fun_fact' on GitHub by visiting:
remote: https://github.com/compsys-progtools/gh-inclass-sp24-brownsarahm/pull/new/fun_fact
remote:
To https://github.com/compsys-progtools/gh-inclass-sp24-brownsarahm.git
* [new branch] fun_fact -> fun_fact
branch 'fun_fact' set up to track 'origin/fun_fact'.
and success!
4.10. Merge conflicts#
We are going to intentionally make a merge conflict here.
This means we are learning two things:
what not to do if you can avoid it
how to fix it when a merge conflict occurs
Merge conflicts are not always because someone did something wrong; it can be a conflict in the simplest term because two people did two types of work that were supposed to be independent, but turned out not to be.
To create the merge conflict we are going to edit the same branch in two different ways locally and in browser. This couls also happen by two different people making edits to the same branch or more commonly, by having edits made on both the compare branch and the base branch of a PR to the same part of the same file.
4.10.1. Edit in browser#
First, in your browser edit the about.md file to have a second fun fact. Commit directly to the fun_fact
branch.
4.10.2. Edit locally#
Then edit it locally to also have 2 fun facts.
nano about.md
My local version looks like this:
cat about.md
I like to ski
I came to URI in 2020
I moved to RI in 2018
Now we check with git
git status
On branch fun_fact
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fun_fact'.
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: about.md
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
and stage and commit
git add .
git commit -m 'another funfact'
[fun_fact 7985615] another funfact
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
4.10.3. Getting a conflict#
Now if we try to pull the changes from GitHub.
git pull
remote: Enumerating objects: 5, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done.
remote: Total 3 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), 938 bytes | 312.00 KiB/s, done.
From https://github.com/compsys-progtools/gh-inclass-sp24-brownsarahm
07897fd..7e78493 fun_fact -> origin/fun_fact
hint: You have divergent branches and need to specify how to reconcile them.
hint: You can do so by running one of the following commands sometime before
hint: your next pull:
hint:
hint: git config pull.rebase false # merge
hint: git config pull.rebase true # rebase
hint: git config pull.ff only # fast-forward only
hint:
hint: You can replace "git config" with "git config --global" to set a default
hint: preference for all repositories. You can also pass --rebase, --no-rebase,
hint: or --ff-only on the command line to override the configured default per
hint: invocation.
fatal: Need to specify how to reconcile divergent branches.
Now it cannot work because the branches are divergent. This illustrates the fact that our two versions of the branch fun_fact
and origin/fun_fact
are two separate things.
diverged means like this diagram:
gitGraph
commit id:"A"
commit id:"B"
branch fun_fact
checkout fun_fact
commit id:"C"
branch origin/fun_fact
checkout origin/fun_fact
commit id:"D"
checkout fun_fact
commit id:"E"
Note that the origin/fun_fact
and fun_fact
have different histories.
the branches have diverged means that they do not agree and that they each have at least one commit that is different from the other.
diverged does not necessarily mean a conflict, sometimes we can simply change what commit has what parent and it will work.
git gave us some options, we will use rebase which will apply our local commits after the remote commits.
Rebase will try to make it like this:
the commits D
and E
get modified some, the time and parent info is updated, but the changes to the content are the same.
git pull --rebase
Auto-merging about.md
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in about.md
error: could not apply 7985615... another funfact
hint: Resolve all conflicts manually, mark them as resolved with
hint: "git add/rm <conflicted_files>", then run "git rebase --continue".
hint: You can instead skip this commit: run "git rebase --skip".
hint: To abort and get back to the state before "git rebase", run "git rebase --abort".
Could not apply 7985615... another funfact
It was not able to do it; beacuse both had edited the same line of the same file. This requires a person to figure out what the content should be.
it tells us what file the issue is in the 2nd line.
4.10.4. Resolving a merge conflict#
To resolve manually, we have to edit the file. We are going to use nano again here.
nano about.md
The file looks like this when we open it up:
I like to ski
I came to URI in 2020
<<<<<<< HEAD
I am from NH
=======
I moved to RI in 2018
>>>>>>> 7985615
git added markup to the file to show us what was in each of the two versions, labeled by the HEAD pointer and the specific commit for the other.
It puts =
between the two. To resolve, we edit the file to be what we want. We can choose one version, the other, or both. We’ll choose both here.
cat about.md
I like to ski
I came to URI in 2020
I am from NH
I moved to RI in 2018
Next, we go back to check in with git.
git status
interactive rebase in progress; onto 7e78493
Last command done (1 command done):
pick 7985615 another funfact
No commands remaining.
You are currently rebasing branch 'fun_fact' on '7e78493'.
(fix conflicts and then run "git rebase --continue")
(use "git rebase --skip" to skip this patch)
(use "git rebase --abort" to check out the original branch)
Unmerged paths:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
(use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
both modified: about.md
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
it tells us how to finish up what we were doing.
First we commit:
git add .
git commit -m 'resolve conflit'
[detached HEAD 07959c0] resolve conflit
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
then use the continue
option
git rebase --continue
Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/fun_fact.
Finally we check in:
git status
On branch fun_fact
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/fun_fact' by 1 commit.
(use "git push" to publish your local commits)
nothing to commit, working tree clean
and push
git push
Enumerating objects: 5, done.
Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads
Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done.
Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 314 bytes | 314.00 KiB/s, done.
Total 3 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (1/1), completed with 1 local object.
To https://github.com/compsys-progtools/gh-inclass-sp24-brownsarahm.git
7e78493..07959c0 fun_fact -> fun_fact
4.11. Prepare for Next Class#
Add file called terminal-vocab.md on a branch linked to this issue. Fill in the template below:
# Terminal vocab
## Before
<insert your diagram from 2024-01-30 prepare>
## Reflection
<!-- write a few bullets assessing your diagram above based on the notes from 2024-01-30. was anything in it not correct? was anything missing? -->
## Final thoughts
<!-- write a few bullets/sentences on how trying to make the diagram did/not help you think about the terms -->
4.12. Badges#
Create a merge conflict in your github in class repo and resolve it using your favorite IDE,. Describe how you created it, show the files, and describe how your IDE helps or does not help in ide_merge_conflict.md. Give advice for when you think someone should resolve a merge conflict manually vs using an IDE. (if you do not regulary use an, IDE, try VSCode)
Read more details about git branches(you can also use other resources) add branches.md to your KWL repo and describe how branches work, in your own words. Include one question you have about branches or one scenario you think they could help you with.
Create a merge conflict in your KWL repo on the branch for this issue and resolve it using your favorite IDE, then create one and resolve it on GitHub in browser (this requires the merge conflict to occur on a PR). Describe how you created it, show the files, and describe how your IDE helps or does not help in merge_conflict_comparison.md. Give advice for when you think someone should resolve a merge conflict in GitHub vs using an IDE. (if you do not regulary use an, IDE, try VSCode) You can put content in the file for this step for the purpose of making the merge conflicts for this exercise.
Learn about GitHub forks and more about git branches(you can also use other resources)
In branches-forks.md in your KWL repo, compare and contrast branches and forks; be specific about their relationship. You may use mermaid diagrams if that helps you think through or communicate the ideas. If you use other resources, include them in your file as markdown links.
4.13. Summary#
branches do not synch automatically
branches are pointers to commits
every commit knows its parents
if two different commits have the same parent, when we try to merge we will have divergent branches
divergent branches can be merged by different strategies
a merge conflict occurs if, when merging branches, a single file has been edited in two different ways
We often visualize git using graphs like subway maps:
However you can also think of what we learned today like this:
Over the next few weeks we will keep refining this understanding.
4.13.1. New bash commands#
command |
explanation |
---|---|
|
concatenate a file to standard out (show the file contents) |
4.13.2. New git commands#
command |
explanation |
---|---|
|
show list of commit history |
|
list branches in the repo |
|
create a |
|
create a |
|
apply or fetch and apply changes from a remote branch to a local branch |
4.14. Experience Report Evidence#
run the command:
git log >> makeup-2024-02-02.md
then mv makeup-2024-02-02.md <rel>
where <rel>
is the relative path from your gh incalss repo to your KWL repo.
commit this file to the experience report branch